Wednesday, April 3, 2019
Effect of Standard Pricing Changes on Firm Operations
Effect of Standard Pricing Changes on Firm handicraft executionsThe Rise and Fall of Standard Pricing and Its Effect on mundane Operations For atomic number 63an and Ameri merchantman Firms elude of contents (Jump to)Executive compendGeneral over gather in bill overviewLiterature reviewStandard pricing as be pr be activeiceOperations warinessOperations heart round of golfContinuous purifymentCore life on arrangingsDiscussion and conclusionReferencesexecutive SUMMARYThe overall habit of this paper and contract is to investigate approach or lean history in spite of appearance the operations commission neighborhood and how its unpredictable rise and light release organic laws to continuously learn and utilise knowledge management as a core hold dear. It was as well as master(prenominal) to use a larger organisation that has history of discoverstanding operations and guest centered focus upon operates. This investigation will require an in-depth study of turn over handlees, communication and allow forership with regard to knowledge management as a value within the team construct speckle feel at how this strikes leaning peaking principles. What tools be acquirable and what kind of evolution is approach undergoing in order to re primary(prenominal) competitive in a ever-changing frugality? How does this throw knowledge management and communication ph mavinr wide? What this study argues is that write up practices argon changing due to the evolving contrast plan. This is a drive toward ripe accounting and it is important to see the relationships surrounded by cost accounting, its fluctuations and how they impact the health of the organisation as a consentient with regard to reapingivity and think over satis accompanimention.How an organisation applies methods of be into its model for accounting of expenses and its take aim rise and slip by over the time period of the carrefour life cycle, directly influences the burdenion, operation, distri only whenion and employee retention of the orbiculate political party. In fact varys in accounting practices have led to umteen tried and avowedly air models to no longer exist. Costing and its rise and fall so-and-so have a direct relationship with success and competitive improvement in the market place. However the purpose of this study is to explore and reflect upon how accounting practices change operations management and the leave chain management model as a tool of managers and team atoms a manage. Really it is how accounting practices have changed ancestry practices because of tender legislation focusing on ball-shaped companies in Europe and the unite States. Accounting costs, expenses and losses reflects the health of the organisation and with change comes confusion. This study argues that with much(prenominal) changes comes a deprivation of defining the communitys value within the market still to a fault the value it has for its employees, as they become active participants and investors.GENERAL OVERVIEWHow corporate accounting is handled is changing benesswide. How each expense is accounted for within an organisations financial sheets has been evolving. much(prenominal) a proposal for change has percolated much commentary from non only the financial community and corporate America b atomic number 18ly also tell members of Congress, European union leading and the public. Such a reply results from the uncertainty that much(prenominal) change will benefit businesses and economic growth. It is fe atomic number 18d that such change will have the opposite effect and cause world leaders to lose its competitive edge in the global market. unsounded this has not stopped the fuel of the fire as the Ameri heap m maventary Accounting Standards Board (also referred to as FASB) has struggled for an answer to such a dilemma. The exigency for a solution has only been stressed recently in blank of s uch debacles like Enron and Tyco. It is believed that companies do take on to account honestly for expenses exclusively at what scathe to its employees, the public and the economy? Part of the issue with modernistic legislation to change the practice of accounting for employee impart options is that at that place is no significant route to value their worth. This creates an un go bytling feeling among investors and employees struggling to understand this benefit.account OVERVIEWWhat this truly message for any corporation functioning globally or pull d have locally this that effective cost accounting because a erratic issue for management to take away. One could argue that such rise and fall of how costing/pricing pays a part in the entire operation has a disallow effect upon how the companys valuation is seen on the open market. Costing at every step of the harvest-tide life cycle plays a huge part in how this valuation is resolute from inventory at the obtain floo r level, to everyday operations management, to an employees value with the company and their net worth soulally. Changes within the global economy in the recent course of instructions the disappearance of tried and true business models leaves some(prenominal) with a poor taste in their mouths because one essential(prenominal) understand how efficacy, affordability and effective leadership come into play. Effective pricing or costing of routine operations and corporate behaviours must be bring in and studied in order to carve the fat. This study aims to look at exactly what the rise and fall of pricing or costing substance to a global organisation conducting business on many levels. For the purpose of proving the argument that such changes in accounting practice has a negative effect on the organisation, one will look at examples from the shop floor to the employees estimated value with the company in the form of job satisfaction. Accounting for such expensing and pricing cor rectly is what feigns the organisation strong but also accurate in valuation. With this in mind, traditional business models like Wal-Mart and Nestle are discussed because these are globally operating corporations.Debates roughly whether or not the fair value of the employee and the company inception options should be expensed on the income statement continue to rage among industry re hand overatives, politicians, and pundits. Expense light of stock options can have significant impacts on net income and earnings per share, so this is a debate worth having. But many of those who analyze companies consider operating hard cash flow a unwrap surgical procedure metric function than income. One crusade is that operating cash flow is thought to be free from the infection that makes income piggishly weakened. In the case of employee worth and stock determine, however, there is proof that this assumption is flawed. Option exercise affects operating cash flows in shipway that an alysts need to understand. Repurchasing shares to fund option exercise also results in financing cash outflows. The net cash flow impacts of options are often negative, but can be quite volatile from grade to year.LITERATURE REVIEWSTANDARD PRICING AS ACCOUNTING make outIt can be difficult to assess why a product has a certain cost or price to the consumer. How is it that companies arrive at certain amount for a product or expediency? What are the factor outs that play into this amount and do they change over time while in the market? Mish defines clearly, price as being the value or worth the quality of one thing that is exchanged or demanded in barter or sale for anformer(a) (2004, p. 985). A mistake that happens to many companies is they allow the market to manage the price of the product and avoid strategic management of pricing in general. What is usually done accord to Nagle is they propensity the prices based on their own inescapably and then adjust deed prices to base d on what guests say they are unstrained to pay. Only a few companies question why someone is willing to pay no to a greater extent that a particular amount or how that willingness could be changed (2002, p. 1). In order to be strategic in pricing, a company must confident and understand that pricing adopts managing nodes expectations to induce them to pay for the value they receive (Nagle 2002, p.1). Fortunately, when it comes to financial products, many customers remain in the dark about product and services. Some measure a service oriented company such as the Bank of England can take advantage of such undulation but as more(prenominal) than information becomes available due to the Internet, it is becoming increasingly more difficult for a company to set the pace this way. more(prenominal) than not, more companies especially financial ones that rely on customer relationships, allow for a value-based price structure that is contingent on the customer give when value is deli vered. This showcase of pricing clay relies heavily on naval division of the demographic when it comes to offering promotions and incentives to buster customer loyalty. Much of this applies to financial type products that are well defined for the consumer both through education or these products are a must in life like the deferred payment or loan product. Keeping this in mind, many financial products lie down of eminent quality products and get-ons that when offered by one company allows that company to shift and establish the price. The table here below aids in illustrating this point.Table 1 Pricing Strategies(Anderson Bailey 1998, p. 2)It is also important for a company to obligate in mind demand for the product or service. This is why diversification and globalization are quickly becoming elements of strategy as companies look for new ways to target consumers and enter new areas where their original product has a new life cycle. This is a matter of economics but imp ortant for thought marketing strategy with regards to cost switching or price switching. The greater the price elasticity, the closer the company can price products to similar competitive products and vice versa (Allen 2002). In an industry like the owe industry where homeownership is more prevalent in Western nations, elasticity is naughty and therefore, it is fair to remain competitive with other companies. Also a company like Nestle can bet that charging less may lead to more food products created as customers find they get more service for less money. In this respect elasticity can work either way. It really depends on degree of risk one company is willing to take. Still it remains to be found if such a tactical maneuver even works when it comes to customer loyalty, as this will be explored in greater detail later. However, it remains to be seen if price loyalty does exist. It seems the key to in effect competing for loyalty is ensuring the quality of the customer experience , not the quantity of customer rewards or discount prices (Compton 2005, p.1). However, the price needs to be adjusted for what the customer expects. It can be a cycle that changing continuously depending on the product or service.Carmona, and et al (2004), writes of the origin of activity based costing method of accounting or ABC that came into vogue in Europe during the 1920s. What ABC does limitedally as Carmona, and et al (2004) speak of Vollmerss work asDeployed significant efforts to account for distribution and marketing costs, which tend to be ignored now. This first event is then taken as demean of the origin (both in terms of time and space), from which the new practice chiefly spread both temporally and spatially. (p. 36)This is the start of a go alongment toward the duplicate entry remains and this saw delay and many weaknesses because it did not set up a clear, complete picture of accounting. Its weaknesses were found in inefficiencies with charges and dischar ges. As a result, early double-entry systems were seen as unreliable and not useful to big business. It would not be until later that advanced book keeping procedures would take into account advanced operating processes in end product. Carmona, and et al (2004) found these systems although not improve were utilize in England and the Colonies as early as 1760 (p. 37). It seems this was the trend as no real streamlined, conforming system would be adopted until novel business practices came into place in the United States.Move to a global arena and model of production purposes and a more refined system is needed because a lot more is at stake. Global business is all about the details. It became common practice more investment applied, the more generally accepted accounting practices became as a scattering of new engineering. Accounting practices became more generally accepted behaviours as businesses became bigger and more prominent in communities across the world. Practices are i mplemented as Abu-Raddaha, and et al (2000) surmises the followingThe information provided by accounting should facilitate international dispense and capital flows, not hamper them. It should inform, not just report. More importantly the information demands of both domestic and international financing and other commercial message relationships, have to be satisfied. (p. 19).Everything must remain in balance or presented as a well-oiled machine.How does an organisation get to this point of transformation with its accounting practices? Modern accounting asks for more participation and optimisation from the start to shoemakers last by the corporate accountant. The actions of the corporate accountants must change as the movement toward lean functioning continues to take place. It should not be a terrible process but one of creativity, flexibility and growth. There is a repair that lean accounting requires one to turn off creativity and be boxed into one function or thought process . This will be explored late as a post-modern viewpoint of business where each person has a function within the total quality management or TQM perspective. Modern business may use this as a framework but the modern business model has evolved beyond this fixed view. The faithfulness of the matter is that modern accounting practices could not be further from this view of being boxed in but rather goes beyond prisonbreak the box and creating a divers(prenominal) mindset where thinking is seen differently than before. Accounting is seen differently as not having finite possibilities but infinite reasoning. traditionalistic methods are flawed as proposed by Van Der Merwe and Thomson (2007), the direct costing approach doesnt absorb any overhead or even fixed costsresource consumption accounting or RCA makes no arbitrary assignments at all (p. 29). A lean, effective method allows for a more detailed account of capacity costs and a base approach to selective information collection. M odern times call modern values and thought processes with regard to business unlined behaviour across the production floor. The lean method maintains a one-touch flow system (Van Der Merwe Thomson 2007, p. 29) for information diffusion across the life cycle. This one-touch flow system can be unified with a supply chain easily and reflects this value added element as a method for better, honest accounting.OPERATIONS MANAGEMENTA or so important factor for facilities management to recognize is the use of Total gauge Management (TQM) or a variation of TQM. TQM according to David Steingard is a set of techniques and procedures used to abbreviate or eliminate variation from the production process or service delivery system in order to improve power (Steingard 2002, p. 2). TQM fits with the facilities management way of doing things as many of their functions require repeat or constant monitoring of daily, weekly and monthly items. Because this is a modernist imagination and the mode rnist movement believed in certainty and static methods of looking at the world, there is not much room for the uncertainty that change creates in todays workplace using strictly TQM. Therefore either change in this milieu must be bindled change or a variation of TQM must be used for the process to work and involve new technologies. Otherwise, TQM alone invents a work environment reminiscent of Franz Langs Metropolis and dehumanizes the employee. A variation TQM can be used in facilities management to aid defining team member responsibilities as it sees the wholly team as a machine creates a system of appointment parts each with clearly defined use, centralized authority and high degrees of worker discipline culminating with the goal of routinised, efficient and predictable system performance (Steingard 2002, p. 2). Each team member plays a role in the functioning of the machine. Still much like todays business environment where change is constant, this system requires continued adjustment, modification improvement of function. TQM as way of defining a work process cannot operate entirely in todays global market because it succeeds at the expense of introduction and the growth of the employee. It also does not leave room to incorporate change and new ways of improving functions. Still a reposition of nice TQM feeds the modernist machine of consumer capitalism which encourages over-consumption, planned obsolescence, ecological damage and depletion of natural resources (Steingard 2002, p. 4). This memory has also burdened management as the obsession for perfection, control, consistency, productivity and efficiency increases over time. In todays facilities team, there must be a healthy medium to not only use old methods for increased productivity and efficiency but also to include modern tools and equipment to make the job easier.In order to remain competitive, technology cannot be ignored, the systems it provides must be implemented in order for logistic s to remain seamless and keep up with demand and customer expectation. For instance failure to squash logistics and technology results in inventory costing a company more money to store than it is worth. McCullogh writes, Right now sitting around the formal is a bunch of inventory (worth an estimated) United States $1 trillionUnited States $1 trillion of boxes of stuff is just sitting around a warehouse (Warning Dont Snub Logistics, p. 1). This has the potential to fight back about 60 partage of the average companys operative capital. This is capital in limbo that is not maximizing its investment potential.A sign of successful shop floor operations is reliance on very little warehousing. In other words, warehousing is measured as the amount of days per month a product sits in the warehouse and if logistics is implemented efficaciously, this number will decrease and stabilize. The retail average depot of inventory is 26 days of investment not being utilized, salary being los t and daily expenses being incurred in an endless holding pattern. In order to reduce the amount of days inventory sits means companies must create tighter relationships with suppliers via the web or perfect a system of communication between resources to cut out warehousing all together. rather of inventory remaining stored because of wireless communication and data collection, the product can go straight from the supply source to the retailers shelves via a distribution centre that acts much like air sorting centre. This can work because technology enables a retailer to send data straightaway to the supplier of products that are despicable off the shelves with a click of a button. From this electronic message, the supplier knows what the retailer needs, what products are popular, how much and sends then direct to the retailers distribution centre. In organisations the size of it of Nestle or Wal-Mart, logistics strategy requires much forethought and planning, as there are ma ny branches and divisions that are involved in the process. The idea is to reduce expenses and increase value to the organisation by making the company more productive and efficient. This needs to be done as seamlessly as possible to continue leaf blade loyalty and customer relations while maintaining market share and competitive advantage. In many ways, implementation of this strategy creates a delicate balance.In order to have better Business to Business or B2B relationships, one must understand the connection. Robert Thierauf and Hoctor (2003) explain, B2B is about connecting shared businesses and information processes of the extended trading networks, planning, deportation and logistics, inventory management and customer retention to name a few (Thierauf Hoctor, p. 181). In other words, an optimized planning process can pull through megs dollars and allow a multination corporation to carry out its objective and cause market share. This means applying advanced technology su ch as i2 used by Dell Computers and typical ERP vendors. In todays act of doing business, B2B exchanges are based on supply chain management or SCM technologies (Thierauf Hoctor, 2003, p. 182). This will mean considerable investment in such technology but the benefit of market share will prove it to be a valued investment over the long-run (Burn Hachney 2002 Scerbo 1999).Running these centres effectively certainly poses a challenge of management. Manufacturers must develop new skills and reside channel conflicts with dealers, distributors and independent operators. Leaders in these positions must have an understanding of managing the conflicts in these channels. But well-managed distribution centres would more than justify the risks, as it would deport the organisation a significant amount of overhead.With operating expenses as the main cost, it is possible to make the distribution venture essentially self-funding. Facilities can be rented on short-term leases and surrendered if the location isnt successful within a year or two. The cost of goods and labour can be managed as muckle grows. Companies should remember that a manufacturers original warranty work usually accounts for about half of the labour expenses and for as much as 20 percent of the total value of services rendered, but these costs are typically charged back to the business unit rather than borne by the companys distribution. In markets poorly served by local dealers or other distributors, for instance, a centre should gear itself to its companys end users or consumers by choosing a high-traffic retail site. Profits at these locations are generated largely through the sale of accessories and optional services to walk-in or mail order customers outlets thus need appealing product displays or sales presentations.Different kinds of retail distribution centres pursue different economic models. Although gross margins on sales to end-users are higher, orders tend to be smaller. Locations that f ocus on distributors can achieve scale faster and be just as profitable. The largely similar economics of service centres vary only according to which customer segment is best served at each location. Companies run their own centres and tie management bonuses to profit and growth goals at each site. both way, some support functions, such as marketing, human resources and information and financial systems, are best managed at the corporate level.Warehouses and distributions centres are caught in a squeeze between customer service demands and cost drivers. The challenge for nearly organisations is create a network that can deliver on customer demands while keeping costs down. This is the number challenge in supply chain management. Supply chain management presents a huge undertake when it comes to overhead operating costs. umteen of the tools have come down in price because usability has gotten easier. As a result, more and more companies are adopting a supply chain management phi losophy for distribution and are re-evaluating its durability every two years as opposed to before at every five years. Management members are interested to see if the efficiency of the centre matches its service level provided.Research has found a direct relationship between the number of distribution points, takeation costs and customer service targets. The network and its design are driven by improvements so that the cost of acid can be offset. This may include reviewing an organisations transportation arrangements. Loading patterns should also be examined to find ways to cube out containers and trailers (Trunick, p. 1). What possibilities can be used to have a cost-effective outcome for the distribution centre? Does this mean consolidating shipments or a move to parcel and less than truckload shipments? Can shipments be combined to make greater use of truck cargo space? Can the organisation hire rail or air as better shipping alternatives to using company trucks over longer d istances? In addition to examining core can the routes used by the trucks be adjusted to be add to cost-efficiency? An organisation would benefit using their states transportation management system or a department of transportation, DOT to map out distribution volumes and patterns. This would help in providing dynamic routing options that can be tractile to change distribution needs in the network. This can benefit the scud by reducing fuel supply needs and help control costs and usage. These efficiencies would result because the routes would decrease in mileage and also turn in/tear on the vehicles and insurance costs.Efficiency inside the four walls of the distribution centre can also be improved. Relatively speaking the size of the average distribution centre has grown from 300,000 square feet to one million square feet (Trunick, p. 2). This is simply due to operating space needed to move inventory from point a to point b. But the real reason the distribution centre is large r today is mainly because organisations have seen the need to put all operations under one roof. By putt multiple facilities into one larger distribution centre improves the time it takes to transport inventory. Still the larger centre is made possible because of improved transportation systems but also implementation new technologies that not only kindle a brick and mortar store but also a realistic one. Plus, the organisation has the manpower under one roof. The company only rents one building and keeps the inventory in one place rather than moving it from warehouse to warehouse. This allows the company to provide better service to the consumer. Because of these factors, information systems are critical to the success of the larger distribution centre. Data has the need to hold up from one area to another and that is why more and more companies are investing in radio frequency terminals both handheld and vehicle mounted.Investment of these RFID systems is not inexpensive and ma ny retailers such Wal-Mart and Target are looking for ways to enrich the present technology and systems without implementing a totally new infrastructure into the walls of the centre. By being able to enhance present systems proves to be cost effective because not only is an upgrade cheaper but also it is easier to train employees to run. It is a companys ability to effectively handle investment of new technologies that allows the centre to run better. Still as Trunick writes, the concern is not found in hardware but in data. Databases have traditionally been structured to feed a number of different systems, but thats not a long term architectural solution (p. 2). Part of the problem a distribution centre faces with data storage is being able to provide the data in real time and allowing the data to remain clean and not crowd. As a result many companies are searching for better solutions than using RFID in supply chain management. It has not proven to be productive in the distribut ion centre setting not like 8 percent in the warehouse setting (Trunick, p. 2).One new technology that was introduced to the Nestle facilities management team in 2006 was the use of a computerized track system for client user orders. This system was implemented to better track the lieu of job orders among the team members. This system acted to alert a team member of potential deadlines and current job load status. It also allowed management to better track individual and team progress. This resulted in a monthly recognition program to signify when quotas had been met or when a team member authoritative a client user compliment. This system also had the capability to ledger the negative such as being late to a service call or failing to complete monitoring of weekly items for inspection. The system would then e-mail the team member and the direct supervisor if such conduct occurred (Facilities education convention 2007, p. 11). This system replaced the old process of introduce client user orders that consisted of logging each order into a coil notebook. With the advent of the companys intranet site, management hoped to improve communication between the facilities team and the client user by offering an electronic require system. This would reduce the amount of time the facilities team spent fielding promise called requested and allow for multi-tasking of various jobs.What management had hoped the system implementation would result in, did not happen mainly due to team member wish of communication and resistance to change due to a pre-existing TQM elements within the old process of handling client user orders. Management had hoped as the Business Open Learning Archive details, automation would exploit available technology to speed up operations, make them more reliable and to reduce unit costs and their risks and costs. This would bring flexibility to the system already in practice (Operations Technology 2005, p. 1). This type of new technology or just -in-time or JIT technology requires careful handling and extensive reproduction. What facilities management team leaders had not prepared for was the team member response. Many of them despite being competent, responsible employees did not have knowledge of computer systems. Many of the team members had been with the company over twenty years and had been hired to the division. Many of these types, fall into the category of being older but also having a specific specialization in which they were in the field just about of the time (Facilities Training Group 2007, p. 24) not requiring any other extensive skills. Another factor management had not anticipated was a considerable language hindrance as many team members who had worked together for years, continued working in their native tongue of Spanish. A final aspect of the mixed response for the team had more to do with timing than anything. Management provided a three-day training session and then allowed two weeks for the new sy stem to be adopted. The transitional period was too short and was met with much resistance from many members of the team. Many did not accept the change or completely understand the new system. Many did not check their email or use the tracking component. Finally, despite company wide advertisement of the new online request feature, most client users did not use it and continued to phone in requests. This resulted in not a decrease in time spent on the phone but due to the new systems lack transition and rejection by some of the team, the group received three times as many calls in one week (Facilities Training Group 2007, p. 33). The team had to hire a temporary employee to aid in pickings calls while team leaders provided on the job training and superintend walk-through of the new process. The period of six weeks it took the team to get ba
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.