Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeares Henry IV, Part One Essay

Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeares Henry IV, Part peerless The relationship between a tyro and his son is an important newspaper publisher in Shakespeares Henry IV, Part One, as it relates to the two main characters of the play, Prince Hal and Hotspur. These two characters, considered as youths and future rulers to the reader, are exposed to father-figures whose actions will puzzle out their actions in later years. Both characters pass away two such father-figures Henry IV and Falstaff for Prince Hal, and the Earl of Northumberland and the Earl of Worcester for Hotspur. Both father-figures for Hal and Hotspur have obvious good and bad connotations in their captivate on the character. For example, Falstaff, in his drinking and reveling, is clearly a poor influence for a future ruler such as Prince Hal, and Worcester, who shares Hotspurs temper, encourages Hotspur to make imprudent decisions. The entire plot of the play is based on which father-figure these c haracters take aim to follow had they chosen the other, the outcome would have been wholly different. At the break of the play, the reader sees that Prince Hal has been acting in a manner which has disappointed his father. The male monarch compares Hotspur to Hal, saying that Hotspur is A son who is the theme of honours tongue, and that riot and dishonour print the brow of Hal (I.i.3). He even wishes that the two were switched Then would I have his Harry, and he mine (I.i.3). The King obviously does not approve of Hals actions, and believes that, if Hal does not change his ways, he will be a poor successor to the throne. This is quite true, as Hal spends the majority of his time in seedy taverns, associating with what his father c eachs rude society (III.ii.... ...ators to join them, and who sets the wheels of the revolution in motion. The consequences of the Hal and Hotspurs choice in father-figures are indeed what leads the play to its final outcome. Hal, who s ides with his father and not Falstaff, becomes a noble prince and redeems himself in the eyes of his father. Hotspur, on the other hand, sides with Worcester, and their collective tempers lead them to make the rash decision to revolt. Their tempers are also responsible for other poor decisions that evade the chance of truce, resulting in the inevitable failure of the rebellion. Indeed, all could have been prevented if Hotspur sided with his father, rather than his uncle, and Hal would have become a desolate woeful had he followed Falstaff. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. Henry IV part one. Ed. P. H. Davison, New York Penguin Books, 1996.